History of Sindh
The land of Sindh
has a hoary past with some of the most striking episodes in history having
occurred in its bosom. It has given a slightly different variation of its name
to our neighboring country and to the religious majority of its inhabitants.
Both the words India and Hindu are derived from Sindhiu, which, in Persian
became Hind and Hindu (the letter H substituted for S) and in Greek and Roman,
Ind (the letter S of Sind having being dropped). The meaning of the word Sindh
is water, referring to the great river.
The Assyrians in the 7th century B.C. knew the
north-western part of the sub-continent as Sinda. Arab geographers, historians
and travelers also called the entire area from the Arabian Sea to the range of
Kashmir mountains Sind. However, when India began to be called Hind by Persians
and Arabs, and Ind by Greeks and Romans, the local people continued to call
their land, Sind. This distinction continued for centuries.
Since the early history of Sind is intimately related to the history of the Punjab and other provinces of Pakistan it need not be dealt with at length. Only a brief account shall be attempted here, without mentioning the Indus Valley civilization which will be discussed some other time.
Since the early history of Sind is intimately related to the history of the Punjab and other provinces of Pakistan it need not be dealt with at length. Only a brief account shall be attempted here, without mentioning the Indus Valley civilization which will be discussed some other time.
Two main Rajput
tribes of Sind are: the Samma, a branch of the Yadav Rajputs who inhabit the
eastern and lower Sind and Bahawalpur; and the Sumra who, according to the 1907
edition of the Gazetteer are a branch of the Parwar Rajputs. Among others are
the Bhuttos, Bhattis, Lakha, Sahetas, Lohanas, Mohano, Dahars, Indhar, Chachar,
Dhareja, Rathors, Dakhan, Langah etc.4 The Mohano tribe is spread over Makran,
Sind and southern Punjab. They are also identified with the ‘Mallah’ of the
Punjab and both have in common a sub-section called Manjari. All these, old Sindhi
tribes are known under the common nomenclature of Sammat.
Dawn of history
reveals an Aryan dynasty in power in Sind. In the Mahabharata (12th or 13th
century B.C.) Jayadrath, King of Sind appears as a partisan of Panduas against
their cousins Kauruas. Next historical mention of Sind is found about 575 B.C.
during the time of Achaemenian dynasty. The Iranian General, Skylax, explored
Indus in a flotilla equipped near Peshawar, conquered the Indus Valley and
annexed it to the Empire of Darius the Great. The conquered province of the
Punjab and Sind was considered the richest and the most populous satrapy of the
Empire and was required to pay the enormous tribute of fully a million
sterling. Next historical record is that of Alexander’s invasion in 326 B.C. A
tribe called Mausikanos whose capital is usually identified with Alor (Rohri)
is said to have submitted. According to Greek historians the territories of
this chief were the most flourishing of all that the Greeks had seen. A few
centuries later Roman historians have mentioned Sind as a rich country. Patala
in lower Sind was known to them as an emporium of trade.
Before lmaduddin
Mohammad Bin Qasim’s arrival here, Rajputs were the ruling race in Sind and in
the rest of northern India. The last Rajput ruler of Sind was Raja Sahasi II
whose dominions extended up to Kashmir. He was a contemporary of Prophet
Mohammad and professed Buddhism as did his father Siharus. The rule of Raja
Sahasi II ended in 632 A.D. the year Prophet Mohammad died. He was succeeded by
his Brahmin chamberlain, Chach, who had become a favourite of Sahasi’s wife.
Chach ruled over Sind for about 68 years from 632-700 A.D. His son Dahir was
the ruler when Mohammad Bin Qasim arrived here in 711 A.D.
“Mohammad Bin
Qasim’s work was facilitated by the treachery of certain Buddhist priests and
renegade chiefs who deserted their sovereign and joined the invader. With the
assistance of some of these traitors, Mohammad crossed the vast sheet of water
separating his army from that of Dahir and gave battle to the ruler near Raor
(712 A.D.). Dahir was defeated and killed.”
The author of
Mujmaul Tawarikh has quoted an extinct Sanskrit work according to which the
original inhabitants of Sind were Jats and Meds. Early Arab writers on Sind
also say that Jats and Meds were important tribes in their time. Ibn Khurdabah
mentions ‘zutts’ as guarding the route between Kirman and Mansura while Ibn
Haukal writes: “Between Mansura and Makran the waters from the Mehran form
lakes and the inhabitants of the country are the south Asian races called Zutt.
The Chinese traveller Yuan Chwang who visited this region in the 7th century
A.D. also mentioned Jats.
According to a
‘Hadis’, Hazrat Abdulla Bin Masood, a companion Prophet saw some strangers with
the Prophet and said that their features and physique were like those of Jats. This
means that Jats we in Arabia even during the Prophet’s time. Hazrat Imam
Bukhari (d. 875 A.D. – 256 A.H.) writing about the period of the Companions in
his book “Al adab al Mufarrad” has stated that once when Hazrat Aisha
(Prophet’s wife) fell ill, her nephews brought a Jat doctor for her treatment. The
Persian Command Hurmuz used Jat soldiers against Khalid Bin Walid in the battle
of ’salasal’ of 634 A.D. (12 hijri). They put forward certain conditions for
joining the Arab armies which were accepted, and on embracing Islam they were
associated with different Arab tribes.12 This event proves that the first group
of Pakistanis to accept Islam were Jats who did it as early as 12 hijri (634
A.D.) in the time of Hazrat Omar.
According to Tibri,
Hazrat Ali had employed Jats to guard Basra treasury during the battle of
Jamal. “Jats were the guards of the Baitul Maal at al-Basra during the time of
Hazrat Osman and Hazrat Ali.” Amir Muawiya had settled them on the Syrian
border to fight against the Romans. It is said that 4,000 Jats of Sind joined
Mohammad Bin Qasim’s army and fought against Raja Dahir. Sindhi Jats henceforth
began to be regularly recruited in the Muslim armies.
The Arab Periods
Turning to the
history of Sind, it may be divided into seven periods:
(1) Pre-Muslim
(2) Arab Rule
(3) Middle Ages
from Mahmud Ghaznavi to the establishment of Mughal Rule
(4) Mughal Period
(5) Kalhora period
(6) The Talpur
Period
(7) The British
Period.
We shall deal with
briefly discussing only certain salient features of each period.
Between the fall of
the Mauryan Empire and the arrival of the Arabs i.e., roughly 200 B.C. to 700
A.D., a span of 900 years, Sind and other parts of Pakistan experienced wave
after wave of hordes from Central Asia settling down in these regions. The
Bactrians, Sakas, Kushans, the Pahlavas and the Huns etc., came, conquered and
settled here. From these stocks, mingled with indigenous blood, ultimately
emerged the new Kshatrya ruling class of Hindus later called Rajputs and the
peasant class of Jats and Gujjars. 16 The most outstanding aspect of this
pre-Muslim period is that Sind was intimately connected with the rest of
Pakistan and not with India. It had either independent kingdoms or kingdoms in
common with Pakistan.
First naval
expedition undertaken by the Arabs in this ocean was during Hazrat Omar’s
caliphate in 636 A.D. A.H. under the command of Osman bin Abi’Aas, the Governor
of Bahrain and Oman. He attacked Thana, a port near modern Bombay. A little
later he sent another naval expedition to Debal in Sind under the command of
his brother Mughira. Raja Chach was the ruler of Sind at that time and his
kingdom was well defended. Mughira was defeated by the Raja’s forces and killed
in action.
Hajjaj took serious
notice of the incident and wrote to Dahir, the ruler of Sind, for the release
of captives as well as the goods which were being sent to the caliphate as
presents by the ruler of Ceylon. Not receiving a favourable reply, Hajjaj, with
the permission of Caliph Walid, sent a force to Debal under the command of
Abdulla bin Nabhan. This force was annihilated by Dahir’s army and its
commander killed in battle. (According to Dr. Daud Pota the tomb of Abdullah
Shah at Clifton in Karachi is of this General, Abdulla bin Nabhan).l9 Again,
Hajjaj sent a bigger expedition to Debal, to oppose which Dahir sent his son
Jaisia with a fairly large contingent. For the second time Arabs were defeated
and their commander Badil bin Tuhfa killed in action at Debal.
Having realised
that the ruler of Sind was a powerful monarch, he was started making
large-scale preparations and took personal interest in the matter of the issue
had now become one of prestige. The commander of this expeditionary force with care
keeping in view all the aspects of problem. The army and its Commander were
given rigorous training for over one year in the desert of southern Iran which
had similar climatic conditions to those of Sind. Through intelligence reports,
all the strong and weak points of the enemy and details of their weapons and
defences were collected, and the Arab Army equipped accordingly. Hajjaj bin
Yusuf went through the minutest details and after thorough study of the maps of
Sind, guided Mohammad Bin Qasim on the strategy to be followed. Hajjaj made
arrangements to convey his messages and orders to Mohammad Bin Qasim from Basra
to any point in Sind within a week. Orders were that Mohammad Bin Qasim should
not attack any city or fort or engage his forces in any large-scale battle with
the enemy without getting orders from Basra. Even instructions concerning the
day and time of attack and weapons to be used in a particular place or battle
were sent by Hajjaj.
MOHAMMAD BIN QASIM’S RULE
Sind had a large
Buddhist population at this time but the ruler, Dahir, was a Brahmin. It is
said that the Buddhists been receiving constant information from their
co-religionists in Afghanistan and Turkistan about the extremely liberal
treatment meted out to them by the Arab conquerors of those regions. In view of
these reports, the Buddhist population of Sind decided to extend full
cooperation to Mohammad Bin Qasim and even acclaimed him as liberator from
Brahmin tyranny. The Buddhist ruler of Nerun (Hyderabad) had secret
correspondence with Mohammad Bin Qasim.
It is generally
believed that Mohammad Bin Qasim conquered areas only up to Multan. No, he
conquered almost the entire Pakistan which then formed part of the Kingdom of
Sind. After conquering Bhatia the Arabs laid siege to Iskandla on river Ravi
and took it. Chach Nama further states that Mohammad Bin Qasim proceeded to the
boundary of Kashmir called Panj Mahiyat, at the upper course of Jhelum just
after it debouches into the plains.21 “With a force of 6,000 Mohammad Bin
Qasim, a youth of 20, conquered and reorganized the whole of the country from
the mouth of Indus to the borders of Kashmir, a distance of 800 miles in three
years 712-15 A.D.
Mohammad Bin
Qasim’s rule was most liberal and his treatment of non-Muslims extremely just
and fair. He not only appointed Hindus to senior administrative posts but left
small Hindu principalities undisturbed. Brahmins had become so loyal to him
that they used to go from village to village and urge people to support the
Arab regime. When Mohammad Bin Qasim was recalled from Sind by the Caliph in
very unhappy circumstances, the Hindus and Buddhist of Sind wept over his
departure; and when he died they erected a statue in his memory and worshipped
it for a long time. Mohammad Bin Qasim’s two sons had a distinguished career. Governor
of Sind and Qasim was Governor of Basra for fifteen years.
Arab period is not
one of peace and tranquility. With the recall of Mohammad Bin Qasim the
province returned to chaos and confusion. A short while later, due to bad
administration, chaos prevailed again. Conditions were so critical that the
next governor, Hakam bin Awanah established a new city called ‘Mahfooza’ (place
of safety) in 732 A.D. – 113 A.H. Later on, after restoring order and reorganizing
most of the Province, Hakam’s general Amroo (the son of Mohammad Bin Qasim)
built another city ‘Mansoora’ (victory) near Shahdadpur in 737 A.D. – 119 AH. This
became the capital of the Arab kingdom. Because of these unsettled conditions
Sind had to be conquered again and again.
Mohammad Bin Qasim
in 715 A.D. to the fall of the Umayyad caliphate in 750 A.D., a period of 35
years, Sind had nine governors. They were Habib Bin Mohlab, Bilal Bin Ahwaz,
Junaid Bin Abdur Rehman Marri, Tamim Bin Zaid Atbi, Hakam Bin Awanah Qalbi,
Amroo Bin Mohammad Bin Qasim and Mansur Bin Jamhur Qalbi. During this period
“Governor Junaid again conquered all the territory up to Beas and Ravi in the
north-east, Kashmir in the north, Arabian ocean in the south, Malwa in the
south-east and Makran in the west.”
In the reign of the
last mentioned Caliph, the Governor of Sind, Umar Hibari, became practically
independent owing nominal allegience to the Caliph. Earlier, during the
caliphate of Mamoon-ur-Rashid, Sind Governor Bashar Ibn-e-Dawood had revolted
and withheld the payment of revenues, but the revolt was quelled judiciously.
It may be of interest to note that the postal and intelligence services of Sind
were directly controlled by the Caliphs.